Comments on: Hitler Banana Video http://www.radcollector.com/news/2009/09/30/hitler-banana-video/ Daily Online Magazine For Action Sports Lifestyle and Product Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:00:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: P http://www.radcollector.com/news/2009/09/30/hitler-banana-video/comment-page-1/#comment-73285 P Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:02:23 +0000 http://www.radcollector.com/news/?p=34058#comment-73285 this is the greatest. hilariouss as well, 3:14. i always wondered why the reverse camber? it\\\'s pretty much useless, unless you want to butter your way down the mountain. i mean i could see it becoming convenient if you are a beginner and/or pussy and need help with your landings. other than that it\\\'s total crap, with good marketing. \\ this is the greatest. hilariouss as well, 3:14.

i always wondered why the reverse camber? it\\\’s pretty much useless, unless you want to butter your way down the mountain. i mean i could see it becoming convenient if you are a beginner and/or pussy and need help with your landings. other than that it\\\’s total crap, with good marketing.

\\

]]> By: Potent Rodent http://www.radcollector.com/news/2009/09/30/hitler-banana-video/comment-page-1/#comment-73264 Potent Rodent Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:57:23 +0000 http://www.radcollector.com/news/?p=34058#comment-73264 this is brilliant. could someone now please create a video about burton's EST and other "minimal mounting point" bindings being the most anti-performance concept since step-ins? Unless they were intentionally trying to make a binding that was completely un-responsive and only had the advantage of "unlimited stance options." EST is similar to the reverse camber concept: offer a "new" product that sacrifices performance for convenience and you can sell more units to all the shitfaces at Big Bear that think their current setup is now obsolete. this is brilliant. could someone now please create a video about burton’s EST and other “minimal mounting point” bindings being the most anti-performance concept since step-ins? Unless they were intentionally trying to make a binding that was completely un-responsive and only had the advantage of “unlimited stance options.” EST is similar to the reverse camber concept: offer a “new” product that sacrifices performance for convenience and you can sell more units to all the shitfaces at Big Bear that think their current setup is now obsolete.

]]>